Why Winning a Judgement Is Only Half the Battle: The Challenge of Collecting Civil Judgements
In the United States legal system, securing a civil judgement against an individual or entity is often perceived as the end of a long legal journey. For many plaintiffs, it represents vindication—a formal recognition by the court that they were wronged and are owed compensation. However, the hard truth is that obtaining a judgement is only half the battle. The other, often more grueling half, is collecting on that judgement.
Despite what courtroom dramas may suggest, defendants don’t automatically write checks once a judge rules against them. In fact, a vast number of civil judgements go unpaid. This article explores why collecting money on civil judgements is so difficult, the legal mechanisms available for enforcement, the strategies used by creditors, and the systemic and practical barriers that often make these efforts frustrating and fruitless.
Understanding Civil Judgements
A civil judgement is a formal decision by a court requiring one party (the “judgement debtor”) to pay a specific sum of money to another (the “judgement creditor”). This can stem from a wide range of disputes—contract breaches, personal injury claims, landlord-tenant issues, small claims, or commercial disputes.
Once a judgement is entered, it becomes a public record and a legal obligation. But contrary to popular belief, the court doesn’t play an active role in collecting the money. Instead, it falls entirely on the creditor to take steps to enforce the judgement.
How Common Are Unpaid Judgements?
A significant proportion of civil judgements are never paid in full, or even at all. Studies and court records from states like California, Texas, and New York show that as many as 70–80% of small claims and civil court judgements remain unsatisfied. The reasons are numerous and complex—ranging from debtor insolvency to deliberate evasion.
Key Reasons Judgement Collection Is So Difficult
1. The Debtor May Not Have Assets
A judgement is only as good as the debtor’s ability to pay. If a person has no income, no bank account, and no tangible assets, there is little a creditor can collect. This is often the case in personal injury cases, tenant disputes, or collections from individuals, where the defendant may already be financially distressed.
Unlike corporations, individuals cannot file for bankruptcy protection and continue operating. Once their resources are depleted, creditors are left with a judgement that amounts to little more than a piece of paper.
2. Assets Are Hard to Locate
Even when a debtor does have assets, locating them is not easy. Bank accounts, employment details, or property holdings are not publicly available in most jurisdictions. Creditors often must file post-judgement discovery or debtors’ examinations to compel disclosure of this information. But if the debtor is evasive or refuses to appear, it can lead to prolonged delays or require additional court motions, including contempt charges.
3. Legal Protections for Debtors
Most states offer exemptions that shield certain income and assets from creditors. For example:
- Social Security, disability payments, and unemployment benefits are typically protected.
- Personal property such as clothing, modest furniture, and sometimes even vehicles may be exempt up to a certain value.
- Homestead exemptions in some states protect primary residences from forced sale.
These protections exist for valid social reasons but severely limit the creditor’s options for recovery.
4. Time and Expense of Enforcement
Judgment enforcement requires time, patience, and money. Creditors must often:
- Hire an attorney or collection agency
- Pay court fees for writs of execution
- Hire sheriffs or marshals to seize property
- File liens on real estate or levies on bank accounts
Each of these actions comes with procedural hurdles and potential opposition from the debtor. If enforcement actions fail, the creditor loses not only the judgment value but also any funds invested in enforcement.
5. Debtors Can Evade Payment
Some judgment debtors will go to great lengths to conceal income or transfer assets to relatives, LLCs, or offshore accounts. Others may work under the table, making wage garnishment impossible. While there are laws against fraudulent transfers, proving intent and unwinding such schemes is legally challenging and costly.
6. Judgment Lifespan and Dormancy
Judgments do not last forever. Most states impose a time limit—typically 7 to 20 years—after which a judgment expires unless renewed. If a creditor fails to renew the judgment in time, they lose all rights to enforce it. Also, if the creditor is not vigilant, judgments can go dormant, requiring extra steps for reactivation.
Enforcement Tools and Their Limitations
1. Wage Garnishment
Creditors can seek a wage garnishment order, which requires the debtor’s employer to withhold a portion of wages. However:
- Federal law limits garnishment to 25% of disposable income.
- Minimum wage workers may be fully exempt.
- Debtors can change jobs or become unemployed.
2. Bank Account Levies
If a creditor knows where the debtor banks, they can freeze and seize funds. But:
- Bank accounts must contain sufficient funds.
- If the account contains protected income (e.g., Social Security), it may be exempt.
- Many debtors simply move or hide their funds.
3. Property Liens
Placing a lien on the debtor’s real property can be effective—especially if the debtor wants to refinance or sell. However:
- The creditor must wait for a triggering event.
- Liens may be behind mortgages or tax liens, reducing payout value.
- If the property is underwater, the lien is worthless.
4. Writs of Execution and Asset Seizure
In theory, creditors can seize vehicles, equipment, or other personal property. In practice:
- Many debtors have nothing of value.
- Sheriffs may be unwilling to enforce writs for low-value assets.
- Costs often exceed asset worth.
What Options Do Creditors Have?
1. Debtor Examinations
Judgment creditors can summon debtors to court to answer questions under oath about their finances. If the debtor fails to appear, they can be held in contempt and even jailed in rare cases. Still, debtors frequently ignore notices or claim poverty.
2. Hiring Collection Agencies
Collection agencies often work on contingency, keeping 30–50% of whatever is recovered. They may use persistent phone calls, skip tracing, and legal threats to motivate payment. However, they face the same obstacles as creditors—uncooperative or insolvent debtors.
3. Judgment Sales or Assignments
Some creditors choose to sell the judgment at a discount to third-party investors. For example, a \$10,000 judgment might sell for \$1,000–\$3,000 depending on collectability. This provides an immediate return but forfeits potential upside.
4. Bankruptcy Filings by Debtors
If a debtor files for bankruptcy, creditors may be entirely shut out. Civil judgments are usually treated as unsecured debts and may be discharged unless tied to fraud, intentional torts, or malicious conduct. Even if non-dischargeable, collecting from a bankrupt debtor is nearly impossible.
Psychological and Strategic Deterrents
Even when a judgment is collectible, the process is often emotionally and psychologically draining. The creditor must be persistent, often confronting hostility, delays, and systemic inertia. Many plaintiffs simply give up—especially when pursuing smaller amounts.
Systemic Criticism: Is the System Broken?
Legal scholars and consumer advocates have criticized the judgment enforcement system as one that favors those with the resources to persist. For low-income plaintiffs or small businesses, the cost-benefit ratio often makes enforcement futile.
On the other hand, debtors’ rights groups argue that harsh enforcement tools can perpetuate poverty—leading to garnished wages, frozen accounts, or even imprisonment for contempt, all stemming from often minor disputes.
Emerging Solutions and Innovations
While there is no panacea, some reforms and technologies offer promise:
1. Online Enforcement Portals
Some states are developing digital enforcement tools that allow for faster lien filings, online status checks, and integrated records between courts and tax authorities.
2. Third-Party Data Access
In limited cases, courts are granting creditors access to credit reports, banking databases, and employment records—reducing the need for invasive discovery.
3. Restorative Justice Models
In community courts or mediation settings, parties can agree on voluntary payment plans and avoid adversarial enforcement altogether.
Conclusion: The Long Road to Justice
Winning a civil lawsuit may offer a sense of moral or legal victory, but collecting a judgment is a second, often more arduous fight. Structural, legal, and economic barriers frequently undermine even the best-laid enforcement efforts. For creditors, this means being strategic, patient, and realistic about the potential outcomes.
The civil justice system may issue judgments, but unless reforms improve enforceability and fairness, many of those judgments will remain nothing more than unpaid promises in a courtroom file.